Impossible Cure Newsletter -- January 2018 |
Separating Fact from FictionIn this world of "fake news" and conventional media outlets that constantly repeat falsehoods about subjects like homeopathy and vaccines, it's hard to know what to believe. I'm afraid there are no easy answers, so all one can do is to diligently exercise discernment, while also keeping an open mind. Here are a few important recent items relevant to the world of health and homeopathy. The Rate of Autism Has Gone Up -- But Has Not Been Reported in the Media I'm sad to report that the U.S Department of Health and Human Services and CDC have released the latest numbers on autism rates in the United States. 1 in 35 children (8-12 years of age) now have autism. This is up from 1 in 68 children reported in 2010. Since the rate in boys is higher than in girls (four times as high), that means that 1 in 28 boys (3-17 years of age) have autism. Moreover, more than 6% of our children (1 in 16) and 8% of boys (1 in 12) have a developmental disability. The new report can be downloaded here. Amazingly (but perhaps not surprisingly), it states that the increase in autism rate from 2014 until 2016 is not very significant because it's "only" up from 2.24% to 2.76%. But do the math. That's actually a 23% increase between 2014 and 2016! It also means that on average, there is now one autistic child per average classroom. In previous newsletters I have graphed the rate of increase in autism. (See the graphs here.) It's still a bit early to say for sure, but this new statistic indicates that we are following the exponential growth curve rather than the linear one. At this rate, 1 in 10 children will have autism by 2030 -- just 12 years from now. What will this mean to the economic and social health of the United States and the rest of the world, whose rates are following close behind? The Flu Vaccine Is Ineffective and Potentially Dangerous. Try Homeopathy for This Year's Flu Instead. Due to a strain mismatch, this year's flu vaccine has been reported largely ineffective (10%), even by mainstream media. Indeed, there are various reasons why getting a yearly flu vaccine actually primes you to get more sick from the flu, especially if the strains don't match (which has become increasingly common). For one thing, vaccines prime your body to fight a specific antigen, which weakens its ability to fight another. It also lowers the rest of your general immune response. And let's not forget all the toxic ingredients in flu vaccines -- including aluminum and mercury. You can read more about what Dr. Mercola has to say about this topic here. But never fear! There is hope with homeopathy! There are many approaches to treating and preventing the flu and I have written about them before. According to Paul Herscu, ND, who does a particularly good job at tracking each year's flu and what remedies seem to be working, Gelsemium (one of the most important classic flu remedies) was working initially, but Lycopodium (not as standard) has now emerged as very important. However, I have noticed that the flu this year has many different presentations, ranging from a stomach-type flu to a sinus-infection type flu and more. So please individualize as always! Herscu's article provides some guidance here. Taking your constitutional remedy can also be very helpful. I also highly recommend using supports like Vitamin C, honey, a neti-pot for nasal congestion, and a humidifier for the cough (but don't add menthol or eucalyptus -- they antidote remedies.) Is Access to Homeopathic Remedies in Danger? There has been a lot of alarm circulating recently online saying that the FDA is about to essentially make all homeopathic remedies illegal because they haven't been tested in formal modern drug studies. I felt very skeptical about these reports. Earlier messages circulating within the homeopathic community had simply stated that the FDA was thinking about cracking down on mixed remedies with a large number of high potencies (perhaps a good idea, since the practitioners who use these often don't know very much about homeopathy), as well as nosodes (not such good news, especially since these remedies are very important in the treatment of autism and other serious diseases). I contacted Dana Ullman about what was going on and he echoed my skepticism. As he told me, the AAHP (American Association of Homeopathic Pharmacists) has an important statement on their website, and do not appear very worried, at least right now. Dana is also currently writing a report about this subject and is asking for your financial support to help him do so. Dana's articles often appear in venues where they get a lot of notice, like the Huffington Post. |
|
Another Excerpt from Dr. Richard Moskowitz's New Book on VaccinationBoston homeopath and family medicine doctor, Richard Moskowitz, MD, has always been an important writer in the area of health, homeopathy, and vaccination. His new book, Vaccines: A Reappraisal is now available on Amazon. Happily, in advance of the book release, he shared a series of book excerpts with the homeopathic community. I asked and was granted his permission to share them with you too. Enjoy! From Chapter 9: The Research Perspective: Epidemiology and Clinical Medicine. "Most universities, hospitals, and medical schools can no longer afford to fund large-scale, prospective clinical trials, and have turned to the vaccine manufacturers for financial support. What they have given up in exchange is control over the design, the conduct, and even the results of their experiments, and thus ultimately their cherished commitment to scientific objectivity as well. Lacking comparable resources of their own, independent investigators have had to rely for the most part on population surveys involving questionnaires and incidence figures, and retrospective clinical studies of medical records regarding adverse events that have already taken place. For decades epidemiologists have puzzled over the paradox that the United States, which ranks near the top of all countries in the level of sanitation and the extent of its public health infrastructure, has nevertheless consistently maintained by far the highest infant mortality rate in the developed world. Suspecting our aggressive vaccination policy, researchers studied 30 countries with well-developed public health infrastructure, including our own. Dividing them into five groups, based on the total number of vaccine doses mandated in the first year of life, they found that the average Infant Mortality Rate of each group was directly proportional to the total number of doses that its member countries required, and that the United States, with by far the highest IMR, administered a total of 26 vaccine doses in the first year, more than any other country in the world. Another investigator analyzed the health records of 325,000 American children under 2 years of age, comparing those who received all vaccines on the CDC-recommended schedule with those who received a smaller number, and found that these "under-vaccinated" kids were significantly less likely to require hospitalizations or ER visits than those who were up-to-date with all their shots. Both studies were noteworthy in directing attention to the nonspecific effect of the vaccination process per se, rather than the specific effects of this or that vaccine. Since even "under-vaccinated" children and those living in countries with the fewest mandates still receive a significant number of shots, the most accurate way to measure the risks and benefits of vaccination would obviously be to compare a large population of children divided into two groups, matched demographically as closely as possible, one fully vaccinated according to the official CDC schedule, and the other not vaccinated at all. It boggles the mind that our country, which yields to none in its professed commitment to science, has never undertaken such a simple and practical survey, or even proposed it as a good idea. Because some pro-vaccine advocates contend that the parents of unvaccinated children prefer more natural approaches, and often mistrust physicians and hospitals, so that their illnesses might go undiagnosed and unreported, it seemed appropriate to focus on adverse reactions that qualify as major diseases and that very few parents would be prepared to treat on their own: 1) Infants receiving the pertussis vaccine were much more likely to develop asthma than those who did not receive it. 2) Children vaccinated with pertussis, HiB, MMR, or Hep B were more prone to develop insulin-dependent diabetes than their unvaccinated peers. 3) The MMR, pertussis, chickenpox, flu, and Hep A and B vaccines have all been causally linked to autoimmune ITP, a serious bleeding disorder. So pervasive is the myth of vaccine safety that even intelligent, well-trained neonatologists routinely vaccinate their most vulnerable patients, premature and low birth-weight babies in the Newborn ICU, even though numerous studies have discovered life-threatening complications like apnea, bradycardia, oxygen desaturation, and cyanosis in these babies within hours after being vaccinated." |
|
A New Year Brings New Opportunity! |
|
Support Amy's work by "Liking" her Author Facebook Page, Don't forget to visit Amy's book websites: Impossible Cure: The Promise of Homeopathy -- amylansky.com/impossible-cure Active Consciousness: Awakening the Power Within -- amylansky.com/active-consciousness and her blogs: |